Comments on: update:Cross Browser Base64 Encoded Images Embedded in HTML http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/16/updatecross-browser-base64-encoded-images-embedded-in-html/ Keep It Simple, Stupid Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:32:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 by: hedgerwang http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/16/updatecross-browser-base64-encoded-images-embedded-in-html/#comment-354 Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:10:50 +0000 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/16/updatecross-browser-base64-encoded-images-embedded-in-html/#comment-354 @Richie Thanks and I've fixed the bug. @Richie
Thanks and I’ve fixed the bug.

]]> by: Richie Hindle http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/16/updatecross-browser-base64-encoded-images-embedded-in-html/#comment-353 Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:06:48 +0000 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/16/updatecross-browser-base64-encoded-images-embedded-in-html/#comment-353 IE is not being buggy when it strips characters following equals signs, as you claim in your comment. You've told it you're using quoted-printable when you're not. IE is not being buggy when it strips characters following equals signs, as you claim in your comment. You’ve told it you’re using quoted-printable when you’re not.

]]> by: hedgerwang http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/16/updatecross-browser-base64-encoded-images-embedded-in-html/#comment-350 Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:28:42 +0000 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/16/updatecross-browser-base64-encoded-images-embedded-in-html/#comment-350 Unfortunately, IE8 does not render data: URIs if its size is greater than 4K, so I ended up with MHTML for all IEs. Thanks. Unfortunately, IE8 does not render data: URIs if its size is greater than 4K, so I ended up with MHTML for all IEs.

Thanks.

]]> by: Scott Schiller http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/16/updatecross-browser-base64-encoded-images-embedded-in-html/#comment-349 Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:17:34 +0000 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/16/updatecross-browser-base64-encoded-images-embedded-in-html/#comment-349 OK, that is pretty ridiculous. Nicely done. I presume this sort of data can't be dynamically generated via JS, but never say never. ;) OK, that is pretty ridiculous. Nicely done. I presume this sort of data can’t be dynamically generated via JS, but never say never. ;)

]]> by: Stoyan http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/16/updatecross-browser-base64-encoded-images-embedded-in-html/#comment-348 Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:38:59 +0000 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/16/updatecross-browser-base64-encoded-images-embedded-in-html/#comment-348 Very, very cool, thanks for sharing! You can consider excluding IE8 from the MHTML way, since it supports data: URIs Very, very cool, thanks for sharing!

You can consider excluding IE8 from the MHTML way, since it supports data: URIs

]]>