Comments for HedgerWow http://blog.hedgerwow.com Keep It Simple, Stupid Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:19:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 Comment on In case you need to implement min-width for IE6 by last chaos gold http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2008/07/09/in-case-you-need-to-implement-min-width-for-ie6/#comment-396 Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:37:45 +0000 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2008/07/09/in-case-you-need-to-implement-min-width-for-ie6/#comment-396 good good

]]> Comment on Imageless Fuzzy Shadows with CSS + HTML by 王承石 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2008/12/05/imageless-fuzzy-shadows-with-css-html/#comment-391 Sun, 31 May 2009 01:03:07 +0000 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2008/12/05/imageless-fuzzy-shadows-with-css-html/#comment-391 哦,我知道为什么在ie8里面不显示了,可能和fireworks有关系,里面包含了工程信息.我把您的图片重新用photoshop生成了,然后再导成base64在ie8里面就正常了. 哦,我知道为什么在ie8里面不显示了,可能和fireworks有关系,里面包含了工程信息.我把您的图片重新用photoshop生成了,然后再导成base64在ie8里面就正常了.

]]> Comment on Embed Base64 encode image into HTML page by 王承石 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2007/06/05/embed-base64-encode-image-into-html-page/#comment-387 Sat, 30 May 2009 14:30:40 +0000 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2007/06/05/embed-base64-encode-image-into-html-page/#comment-387 你好,联系您的gtalk一直联系不上. 您做得那个例子在ie8下是不显示阴影的. 原因有两个可能base64编码有问题,或者ie8对png的base模式还不支持,我再找找别的png的base方法是否能显示吧,就能确定了. 你好,联系您的gtalk一直联系不上.
您做得那个例子在ie8下是不显示阴影的.
原因有两个可能base64编码有问题,或者ie8对png的base模式还不支持,我再找找别的png的base方法是否能显示吧,就能确定了.

]]> Comment on What new Chief Technology Officer of the US need to do? by Estelle http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2008/10/26/what-new-chief-technology-officer-of-the-us-need-to-do/#comment-370 Thu, 14 May 2009 17:45:33 +0000 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2008/10/26/what-new-chief-technology-officer-of-the-us-need-to-do/#comment-370 IE6 is good for the economy. It keeps more webdevs employed! IE6 is good for the economy. It keeps more webdevs employed!

]]> Comment on In case you need to implement min-width for IE6 by Jens Grochtdreis http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2008/07/09/in-case-you-need-to-implement-min-width-for-ie6/#comment-368 Tue, 12 May 2009 08:08:08 +0000 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2008/07/09/in-case-you-need-to-implement-min-width-for-ie6/#comment-368 It would have been nice if you had described what you have done. Is it necessary to have two divs? with negative margins? Has the structure anything to do with the outcome? Where are the points to modify? It would have been nice if you had described what you have done. Is it necessary to have two divs? with negative margins? Has the structure anything to do with the outcome? Where are the points to modify?

]]> Comment on See how IE8 breaks by Jens Grochtdreis http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2008/03/05/see-how-ie8-breaks/#comment-367 Tue, 12 May 2009 08:05:46 +0000 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2008/03/05/see-how-ie8-breaks/#comment-367 Well, in the final version of IE8 you can type into the inputfield. tested with IETester. Well, in the final version of IE8 you can type into the inputfield. tested with IETester.

]]> Comment on Found a new JS pattern from MSDN. by dexbol http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/30/found-a-new-js-pattern-from-msdn/#comment-362 Sat, 02 May 2009 10:26:48 +0000 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/30/found-a-new-js-pattern-from-msdn/#comment-362 it's funny. WTF!?? what the fuck?? it’s funny.
WTF!?? what the fuck??

]]> Comment on Found a new JS pattern from MSDN. by Butterfish http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/30/found-a-new-js-pattern-from-msdn/#comment-361 Sat, 02 May 2009 10:02:17 +0000 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/30/found-a-new-js-pattern-from-msdn/#comment-361 Thanks for the laugh! Thanks for the laugh!

]]> Comment on Found a new JS pattern from MSDN. by Rob Mueller http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/30/found-a-new-js-pattern-from-msdn/#comment-360 Fri, 01 May 2009 04:05:57 +0000 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/30/found-a-new-js-pattern-from-msdn/#comment-360 You'll have to wait for Perl6 junctions to do that. Bring on the heat death of the universe :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perl_6#Junctions You’ll have to wait for Perl6 junctions to do that. Bring on the heat death of the universe :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perl_6#Junctions

]]> Comment on Found a new JS pattern from MSDN. by Vy http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/30/found-a-new-js-pattern-from-msdn/#comment-359 Fri, 01 May 2009 00:04:26 +0000 http://blog.hedgerwow.com/2009/04/30/found-a-new-js-pattern-from-msdn/#comment-359 Doesn't (oWorkItem.tagName == "BODY") make the second expression redundant anyway? And why are they checking for "B" when they're trying to "make sure menu doesn't interfere with links and buttons"? Doesn’t (oWorkItem.tagName == “BODY”) make the second expression redundant anyway?

And why are they checking for “B” when they’re trying to “make sure menu doesn’t interfere with links and buttons”?

]]>